County of maui v. hawaii wildlife fund. Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbe...

Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme

County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. ... Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co v. NRDC, 462 U.S. 87, 105 (1983) What is the typical length for an EA? 10-15 Pages / 100-150 Pages. ... It has also planned precise mitigation measures to offset the harm to wildlife and the environment, compensating for it with nearby wildlife preserves, extra ...County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on November 6, 2019, during the court's October 2019-2020 term.The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.. The court vacated and remanded the 9th Circuit's decision in a 6-3 ruling. The court held "a permit is required when there is ...The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is issuing a memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant ...IMDb is the world's most popular and authoritative source for movie, TV and celebrity content. Find ratings and reviews for the newest movie and TV shows. Get personalized recommendations, and learn where to watch across hundreds of streaming providers.Dec 10, 2020 · Hawaii Wildlife Fund on a case-by-case basis to National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Under Maui , systems or facilities that discharge a pollutant from a point source into ground water that reaches a water of the United States that is the functional equivalent of a direct discharge from a point source requires a ... On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups ... The County of Maui appealed the Ninth Circuit's decision and argued that the CWA's permittingOn April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund , No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups against a wastewater reclamation facility operated by the County of Maui, and decided a fundamental question regarding the scope and ...The panel held that the County was liable under the Act because it discharged pollutants from a point source, the HAWAI‘I WILDLIFE FUND V. CTY. OF MAUI 3 pollutants were fairly traceable from the point source to a navigable water such that the discharge was the functional equivalent of a discharge into the navigable water, and the pollutant ...Jan 21, 2021 · Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program for point source discharges that travel through groundwater before reaching a water of the United States. Consistent with EPA Guidance; County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Your name/ Your company dd/mm/yyyy The Case What event triggered the initial court case? Who was involved? What are the facts of the case? How the Case worked through the Court System: Court System Functions Progress Federal Level Project 1140 S.Ct. 1462 206 L.Ed.2d 640. COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, Petitioner v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, et al. No. 18-260. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued November 6, 2019Nov 6, 2019 · The U.S. Supreme Court has now decided County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260). statutory interpretation Clean Water Act ENVIRONMENT water environmental law Issues The case: County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Oral arguments: Nov. 6 into the nearby ocean. In this case, the Hawaii Wildlife Fund, along with three other non-profits, ...MICHAEL VICTORINO. In its ruling in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al, the U.S. Supreme Court did not issue a “win” or “lose” order. It did not rule against Maui County ...Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui, CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/KJM, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). In other words, a person desiring to discharge any pollutant from a point source into the navigable waters of the United States ...Jul 28, 2020 · Instead of gutting the Clean Water Act as many had feared, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly measured decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, largely preserving the jurisdictional reach of the iconic law. Yet in the wake of the decision, the courts and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will almost ... COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND ET AL CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 18–260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020Clean Water Act. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable ... Clarence Thomas • Neil Gorsuch • Samuel Alito. County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund is a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on November 6, 2019, during the court's October 2019-2020 term. The case came on a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a draft memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notClean Water Act. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable ... The case stems from a dispute between the county and a group of environmental nonprofits led by the Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club of Maui and Surfrider Foundation over millions of gallons that ...The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a draft memorandum to provide guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are not... County of Maui v Hawaii Wildlife Fund. The Clean Water Act primarily ... pdf pdf County of Maui v Hawaii Wildlife Fund US Supreme Court Decision. pdf pdf ...The U.S. Supreme Court, in its groundbreaking decision last year in County of Maui, Hawaii v.Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), ruled that the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires a permit for a point source discharge through groundwater to navigable waters under certain circumstances and it established a new standard likely to see significant interpretation by regulatory authorities ...In April of 2020, Justice Breyer, delivering the Supreme Court's opinion in Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, told us that "the traditional common-law method, making decisions that provide examples ...COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, PETITIONER v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND, ET AL. Notice: The LEXIS pagination of this document is subject to change pending release of the final published version. Prior History: [**1] ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 886 F.3d 737,Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 328227, at *5–6 (D. Haw. Jan. 23, 2015). The court acknowledged that no study confirms the “point of entry into the ocean of flow from [W]ells 1 and 2.” Id. at *2. But it nonetheless held against the County after “repeatedly30 avr. 2020 ... ... County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. This case revolves around the practice of the Maui sewage plant partially treating ...Regardless of the permitting authority, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1476 (2020) (Maui), which held that discharges to groundwater that eventually reach WOTUS by means of a “functional equivalent” of a direct discharge are subject to the NPDES permitting program ...The U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (Maui) on April. 23, 2020.1 Until then, there was a split among the.County of Maui v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund Abstract: On April 23rd, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in a decades-old environmental issue, solidifying the power of the Clean Water Act. Since the 1980s, a wastewater treatment facility in Maui had been discharging daily millions of gallons of treatedSee United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18–260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020The County of Maui's wastewater reclamation facility sent millions of gallons of partially treated water through half a mile of groundwater, eventually ending up in the ocean. ... The court ruled in a 6 to 3 vote in favor of the Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Tags : Categories : Uncategorized. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Your email address will not be ...In a victory for NAHB and home builders, the U.S. Supreme Court on April 3 rendered a 6-3 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. The case concerns whether pollutants that enter groundwater — and then reach navigable waters — are regulated under the Clean Water Act.Feb 1, 2018 · Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 328227, at *5–6 (D. Haw. Jan. 23, 2015). The court acknowledged that no study confirms the “point of entry into the ocean of flow from [W]ells 1 and 2.” Id. at *2. But it nonetheless held against the County after “repeatedly Applying the Supreme Court's County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Program, 6321 [2021-01254]In County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court spelled out—albeit with substantial ambiguity—the circumstances under which the CWA can be used to regulate pollution that is discharged to groundwater from a point source. The Court held that the CWA requires a federal permit where a discharge to groundwater is the “functional ...Liz Trotter, Earthjustice, (305) 332-5395. Washington, D.C. —. Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui v. Hawai ʻ i Wildlife Fund siding with clean water advocates that point source discharges to navigable waters through groundwater are regulated under the Clean Water Act. The following is a statement from David Henkin ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notHAWAI`I WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; SIERRA CLUB-MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non- ... County of Maui, ECF No. 432-3, PageID #s 10377-78. The County began discharging wastewater into Wells 1 and 2 in May 1982. It9 déc. 2020 ... ... the U.S. Supreme Court's recent County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund decision should be applied to its Clean Water Act NPDES permittingRead Hawai'i Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui, CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database ... Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui; Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS . Rapanos v.HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - The governor, Maui's mayor, other government officials and nonprofit leaders will hold a news conference Wednesday to discuss wildfire recovery efforts. The news ...Lions are the majestic mammals known for strength and power. Here are 10 cool facts about lions, aCC0rding to the World Wildlife Fund and Just Fun Facts. Size matters in the animal kingdom with lions being the second largest cat in the worl...30 avr. 2020 ... This culminated in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, a case recently decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision resolves a ...Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. County of Maui (15-17447) May 6, 2016. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is considering the viability of the so-called “conduit theory” of liability under the Clean Water Act—that unconfined groundwater can act as a point source if it conveys pollutants from a point source into waters of the United States. CSAC ...Clean Water Act. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable ...In the first, the district court found the County liable as to Wells 3 and 4 for discharging effluent through groundwater and into the ocean without the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit required by the CWA. Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui , 24 F.Supp.3d 980, 1005 (D. Haw. 2014).Opinion. CIVIL NO. 12-00198 SOM/BMK . 06-25-2015 . HAWAI`I WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; SIERRA CLUB-MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non-profit corporation; and WEST MAUI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION, a Hawaii non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v.County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Your name/. Your company. dd/mm/yyyy ...On April 23, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund that found a point source discharge of pollutants into groundwater, that then reaches navigable waters, is regulated under the Clean Water Act. Writing for the Court's majority, Justice Stephen Bryer said the Clean Water Act requires a permit "if the addition of the pollutants through groundwater is ...Honua Kai Maui Resort is a luxurious vacation destination that offers breathtaking ocean views and exceptional amenities. Located on the beautiful Kaanapali Beach in Lahaina, Hawaii, this resort is perfect for those who want to enjoy a rela...WASHINGTON — EPA has rescinded a guidance document issued in the final days of the Trump Administration that blatantly misinterpreted the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. “This hastily-issued guidance document allowed polluters more leeway than either the Maui decision or the Clean …Hawaii Wildlife Fund (2020) that expanded §402 jurisdiction over industrial discharges into unregulated groundwater that is subsequently indirectly conveyed (through groundwater) into WOTUS. In the Maui case, the court held that such indirect discharges are covered by §402 if they are the "functional equivalent" of direct discharges into ...County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund et al. US Supreme Court (Case No. 18-260) National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) Position & Amicus Brief Overview On February 19, 2019, the US Supreme Court granted the petition for review submitted by Maui County Department of Environmental Management on the question of whether the CWACounty of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund et al. US Supreme Court (Case No. 18-260) National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) Position & Amicus Brief Overview On February 19, 2019, the US Supreme Court granted the petition for review submitted by Maui County Department of Environmental Management on the question of whether the CWAApr 30, 2020 · On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 590 U. S. ____ (2020), holding that, when pollutants originate from a point source, but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source (in this case groundwater), it is the functional equivalent of a direct discharge from the ... All parties agree that the wastewater enters 8 COUNTY OF MAUI v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND. THOMAS, J., dissenting. groundwater from the wells and does not directly enter nav-igable waters. Based on these undisputed facts, there is no “discharge,” so I would reverse the judgment of the Ninth Circuit. I respectfully dissent.See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . Syllabus . COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18-260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020Sep 16, 2021 · Accordingly, EPA conducted a review of the Maui guidance. In April 2020, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, addressing the question of whether a Clean Water Act NPDES permit is required for releases of pollutants from a point source to a jurisdictional water through groundwater. 140 S.Ct. 1462 (2020 ... 30 avr. 2020 ... This culminated in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, a case recently decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision resolves a ...COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII. v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND . ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT . No. 18-260. Argued November 6, 2019—Decided April 23, 2020 ... Petitioner County of Maui's wastewater recl amation facility collects sewage from the surrounding area, partially treats it, and each day ...All parties agree that the wastewater enters 8 COUNTY OF MAUI v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND. THOMAS, J., dissenting. groundwater from the wells and does not directly enter nav-igable waters. Based on these undisputed facts, there is no “discharge,” so I would reverse the judgment of the Ninth Circuit. I respectfully dissent.Feb 1, 2018 · The County of Maui (“County”) appeals the district court's summary judgment rulings finding the County violated the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) when it discharged pollutants from its wells into the Pacific Ocean, and further finding it had fair notice of its violations. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club—Maui Group, Surfrider Foundation ... ... County of Maui v Hawaii Wildlife Fund. The Clean Water Act primarily ... pdf pdf County of Maui v Hawaii Wildlife Fund US Supreme Court Decision. pdf pdf ...Maui is one of the most popular tourist destinations in Hawaii and many visitors opt to rent a car to explore the island’s beautiful landscapes and attractions. If you’re planning a trip to Maui, you’ll likely be flying into the Maui OGG Ai...Clean Water Act: County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund11 In one of its major environmental rulings of the 2019-2020 term, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of the CWA’s applicability to pollutant discharges that migrate through groundwater to regulated navigable surface waters.12 In County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Court heldNGWA: initial guidance document "falls short" The National Ground Water Association has submitted comments to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their draft guidance to the regulated community and permitting authorities on applying the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, in the Clean Water Act Section 402 ...Jul 28, 2020 · Instead of gutting the Clean Water Act as many had feared, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly measured decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, largely preserving the jurisdictional reach of the iconic law. Yet in the wake of the decision, the courts and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will almost ... Honua Kai Maui Resort is a luxurious vacation destination that offers breathtaking ocean views and exceptional amenities. Located on the beautiful Kaanapali Beach in Lahaina, Hawaii, this resort is perfect for those who want to enjoy a rela...On 14 January, 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a guidance memorandum on the application of the U.S. Supreme Court's 23 April 2020 decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii ...20 sept. 2021 ... ... County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. As the masochists who follow the torturous case law we call Clean Water Act jurisprudence are well ...County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. Docketed: August 30, 2018: Linked with 17A1343: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth …In County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund , the Supreme Court considered whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit for the discharge of a pollutant from a …HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - The governor, Maui's mayor, other government officials and nonprofit leaders will hold a news conference Wednesday to discuss wildfire recovery efforts. The news ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notHawai'i Wildlife Fund - Oral Argument 2.0 - U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument Follow-Up Analysis. County of Maui v. Hawai’i Wildlife Fund. Whether the …Feb 7, 2022 · 1 County of Maui v. Haw. Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 1468 (2020). 2 A point source is defined as “any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance.” 33 U.S.C.S. § 1362(14) (LexisNexis 2021). 3 County of Maui, 140 S. Ct. at 1468. 4 Id. at 1476–77. 5 See Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006) (plurality opinion) (considering ... In April of 2020, Justice Breyer, delivering the Supreme Court's opinion in Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, told us that "the traditional common-law method, making decisions that provide examples ...LII note: the oral arguments in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund (No. 18-260) are now available from Oyez. The U.S. Supreme Court has now decided County of Maui, ... Norman A. Dupont: County of Maui v. Hawai'i Wildlife Fund: A Preview of the Supreme Court's Review of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Groundwater, ABA (May 10 ...Appellees County of Maui, Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club - Maui Group, Surfrider Foundation and West Maui Preservation Association answering brief due 06/14/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11994287] (RT) [Entered: 02/05/2021 12:04 PM]Clean Water Act › Groundwater › Hawaii Wildlife Fund v County of Maui + Follow. The Clean Water Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 1972 to reduce levels of toxic substances in ...HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - The governor, Maui's mayor, other government officials and nonprofit leaders will hold a news conference Wednesday to discuss wildfire recovery efforts. The news ...Apr 27, 2020 · Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 24 F. Supp. 3d 980, 998 (D. Haw. 2014). The Ninth Circuit affirmed but applied a different standard, holding that a permit is required where "the pollutants are fairly traceable from the point source to the navigable water such that the discharge is the functional equivalent of a discharge into the ... The names of the eight main Hawaiian Islands are Hawaii Island, Oahu, Maui, Kauai, Lanai, Molokai, Kahoolawe and Niihau. Despite the fact that there are eight main islands, there are only four counties in the state. They are Hawaii, Honolul...The opinions collected here are those issued during October Term 2019 (October 07, 2019, through October 04, 2020).Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports, including final …In County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court held 6-3 that when there is a “functional equivalent of a direct discharge” from a point source to navigable waters, an appropriate permit is required under the CWA. This ruling, according to several policy experts, is expected to cause future uncertainties and continued ...Supreme Court holds that Clean Water Act requires a permit for the "functional equivalent of a direct discharge" from a point source to a navigable water. The U.S. Chamber filed an amicus brief at the merits stage, arguing that the Act's permitting program applies to discharges directly into navigable waters, but not most indirect discharges (which are addressed by other environmental ...On December 10, 2020, the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") published a draft guidance in the Federal Register clarifying how the agency would interpret the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Cty. of Maui v.Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020).The case, which was decided on April 23, 2020 concerned whether discharges of pollutants which traveled through ...Court's recent Clean Water Act (CWA) decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020). These entities may now face both governmental and private suits if they fail to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from state or federal authorities—even though they are notGet County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. . In this webinar, three current and former Duke Law School facultyNov 20, 2018 · County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Ha County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund et al. US Supreme Court (Case No. 18-260) National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) Position & Amicus Brief Overview On February 19, 2019, the US Supreme Court granted the petition for review submitted by Maui County Department of Environmental Management on the question of whether the CWACONCLUSION. The court denies the motion to dismiss and the motion to strike exhibits. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 8, 2012. /s/ Susan Oki Mollway Susan Oki Mollway Chief United States District Judge Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. v. County of Maui; Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK; ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 17 Maui, Hawaii is known for its stunning beaches, breathtaking land Hawaii Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 886 F.3d 737, 749 (9th Cir. 2018) (emphasis added). Based on the circuit split on this issue, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in 2019.On April 23, 2020, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund , No. 18-260, 140 S. Ct. 1462, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), a case which pitted environmental groups against a wastewater reclamation facility operated by the County of Maui, and decided a fundamental question regarding the scope and ... Addressing the Sixth Circuit's decision after County of Ma...

Continue Reading